Analysis of the contested decision
Review of the decision, its basis, and its economic consequences.
Expertise in decisions by public or regulatory bodies. Analysis of fault, causation, and financial damages.
The expert opinion involves analysing the economic consequences of a decision made by a public or regulatory body. It is required when a company or individual challenges such a decision, or must defend its merits, in relation to an alleged fault, causation, or damages.
The engagement is based on analysing whether a fault exists, the causal link with the alleged damages, and quantifying the harm by comparing the normal situation with the actual situation.
Review of the decision, its basis, and its economic consequences.
Assessment of whether a fault exists and its direct link to the alleged damages.
Assessment of the financial harm by comparing the normal and actual situations, including additional costs and past or future lost profits.
Expert report, response to opposing arguments, and support for the company throughout the proceedings.
When a decision is based on an error, an omission, or a questionable application of the rules and results in economic damage.
The State, the AMF, the European Commission, the Autorité de la Concurrence, and more broadly any public or regulatory body.
By comparing the actual situation with the situation that would have prevailed absent the contested decision, identifying additional costs and lost profits.
Yes. We assist both companies challenging a decision and the bodies or parties defending it.
In-depth knowledge of the procedures and economic issues related to public and regulatory decisions.
Economic and financial analysis of damages, based on comparing the actual situation with the situation that would have prevailed absent the disputed events.
Deliverables tailored to administrative and judicial proceedings.
contact us