Skip to content

Fairness Opinion

Independent expert for public tender offers and capital transactions. Multi-criteria analysis in accordance with AMF instructions and recommendations.

When is a fairness opinion required?

A fairness opinion involves assessing the fairness of the financial terms of a transaction based on an independent analysis.
It is required in particular in certain public tender offer contexts or where conflicts of interest exist.

METHODOLOGY

SORGEM Évaluation implements a rigorous approach based on a multi-criteria analysis in accordance with AMF instructions and recommendations.

Scoping the transaction

Understanding the transaction, the stakeholders, the terms, and the governance and market issues involved.

Review of information

Analysis of financial, legal, and operational data, with particular attention to the consistency of the assumptions used.

Multi-criteria valuation

Implementation of analogical and intrinsic approaches, cross-checked against valuation references such as share prices, transactions in the company's capital, and broker notes.

Report and opinion

Presentation of the due diligence performed, the methods used, the reasons for their selection, and a conclusion on the fairness of the financial terms, in a report in the format expected by the AMF.

It assesses the fairness of the financial terms of a transaction, based on an independent, multi-criteria analysis. It also aims to ensure equal treatment among shareholders.

Where conflicts of interest or regulated situations exist, the AMF may require the appointment of an independent expert.

Analogical approaches (listed comparables, transactions) and intrinsic approaches are implemented, alongside the analysis of valuation references (share prices, broker notes, transactions in the company’s capital).

The due diligence performed, the methods used, the assumptions applied, and the reasons behind the conclusion on fairness.

WHAT WE OFFER

  • Recognised independent expertise

    Extensive experience in the field, enriched by regular dialogue with the AMF and our ongoing analysis of market transactions through the SORGEM Fairness Opinion Observatory.

  • Rigorous multi-criteria approach

    Cross-checking of analogical and intrinsic approaches along with the analysis of valuation references to assess the financial terms.

  • Binding conclusion

    A well-reasoned, documented opinion that can be used by parties and authorities.

Have a question or a need?

contact us